Montana Data Centers Face Local Pushback
Coverage from KRTV News Great Falls, Daily Montanan, and others
Articles
28
Active Days
65
The Topic

Montana communities are placing new conditions on data center development as residents, county officials, and advocacy groups question projects’ effects on electricity demand, water, land, air quality, and public costs. Missoula County paused new and expanded facilities for up to a year, a proposed Bonner project was withdrawn after public opposition, and ballot initiatives in Yellowstone and Butte-Silver Bow counties seek stronger voter control. The debate is also shaping project timelines and legal strategies, while state and industry representatives argue that companies can bring jobs and investment if they pay for required power and infrastructure.
First Article: 05/14/26
Latest Article: 07/17/26
Summary
- Missoula County approved a moratorium of up to one year while it reviews water, air, heat, noise, wastewater, and power-infrastructure impacts.
- The proposed Krambu data center at Bonner Mill Industrial Park was withdrawn after an online petition drew nearly 50,000 signatures and residents raised water and power concerns.
- Groups in Yellowstone and Butte-Silver Bow counties are pursuing ballot measures that would require two-thirds voter approval for data center construction or expansion.
- Yellowstone County is challenging its proposed ballot measure in court, while Quantica Infrastructure supports the lawsuit over the planned Broadview campus.
- Quantica’s proposed Big Sky Digital Infrastructure Campus could cover about 5,000 acres and has sought 7,235 megawatts through interconnection applications.
- Montana’s Ratepayer Protection Pledge requires participating companies to cover energy and infrastructure needs rather than shifting those costs to consumers.
- Missouri examples show the same tension between economic-development arguments and local efforts to delay, restrict, or prohibit projects.
History
The story now places stronger emphasis on local political control and project timing, with the Bonner proposal specifically identified as withdrawn after a large petition campaign. It also broadens the comparison set to Missouri, while the core dispute over who pays for infrastructure costs remains unchanged.
The story has sharpened from general local resistance into a more explicit fight over how Montana data centers will pay for power and infrastructure. The Broadview/Quantica proposal is now framed as the central legal and regulatory battleground, alongside new county moratorium and ballot-approval actions.
