More Projects Run Into Politics, Permits, and Power
Utah's Stratos proposal remained the clearest pressure point. A Morning Consult poll found 53% of Utah voters oppose the Box Elder County project, and Gov. Spencer Cox said the rollout was not good after the unusually fast push for approvals triggered backlash over water, power and process. With a water-rights request already pulled after protests, the project now looks less like a straightforward campus build and more like a prolonged permitting and political fight.
Cities are also putting more conditions in writing. El Paso staff proposed ending incentives for new in-city data centers and requiring special-use permits, City Council review, community benefit agreements, and detailed disclosures on water, energy, emissions and noise. In Illinois, local concern around Elk Grove Village fed a wider state debate over water reporting, environmental permits, power sourcing, and even a two-year pause on new tax incentives.
The underlying buildout pressure did not ease. Georgia Power's fight over a 35-mile transmission corridor in Coweta and Fayette counties shows how data center demand is now colliding with land-use politics deeper in the grid, with the utility saying about 80% of planned new power from a broader expansion will serve data centers. A newly disclosed Memphis compute agreement would have Anthropic pay $1.25 billion a month through May 2029 for access to Colossus capacity, a reminder that large AI tenants are still willing to sign enormous commitments to secure supply.
Key Points
- Utah's Stratos proposal faces broader resistance after a statewide poll showed 53% opposition and Gov. Spencer Cox criticized the rollout.
- El Paso staff proposed no incentives, special-use permits, council review, and community benefit agreements for future in-city data centers.
- Illinois kept up its push for water, permitting, and power rules as ComEd territory carries more than 28 gigawatts of data center applications, while Ohio's 2025 data center sales-tax break came in at roughly $1.57 billion.
- Georgia Power's 35-mile Project Wansley transmission line has become a local land-rights fight tied to expected data center load growth.
- A SpaceX filing disclosed Anthropic's agreement to pay $1.25 billion a month through May 2029 for access to Memphis Colossus compute capacity.
Implications
Early political support is no longer enough for very large campuses; unresolved water, power, and local-cost questions can quickly reopen projects that looked fast-tracked.
More jurisdictions are shifting from case-by-case backlash to formal permit, disclosure, and subsidy rules, which points to longer lead times and heavier predevelopment work.
Demand remains strong enough to support major transmission spending and multiyear capacity precommitments, so the bottleneck is increasingly power delivery and local acceptance.
Things to watch
Watch
Whether Utah officials add conditions or slow Stratos in the next round of approvals after the water-rights retreat and statewide pushback.
Watch
El Paso City Council's May 26 response to the proposed no-incentive and special-permit regime, and whether nearby projects get pulled into the debate.
Watch
Whether Georgia Power can keep the Wansley corridor on schedule as eminent-domain disputes test how fast grid upgrades for data center load can move.
