Last Update: 08/01/2026 at 1:01 PM EST

Cities Revise Data Center Rules

Coverage from Americus Times-Recorder, Lehigh Valley Public Media, and others

Articles

10

Active Days

56

The Topic

Cities Revise Data Center Rules topic image

Cities in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Georgia are tightening or considering rules for data centers as developers propose new facilities and warehouse conversions. Measures include industrial-district limits, conditional-use approvals, public hearings, setbacks, noise studies, and disclosures about water, electricity, backup power, and environmental effects. The decisions could affect whether projects proceed, how quickly they are reviewed, and who pays for mitigation or related utility work.

First Article: 06/02/26

Latest Article: 07/27/26

Summary

  • Allentown is reviewing Quantm Group’s proposed conversion of a warehouse into an almost 250,000-square-foot edge data center after resident opposition and a withdrawn application.
  • Akron’s planning commission approved a measure requiring future data centers to obtain conditional-use permits, disclose water and electricity use, complete noise studies, and identify backup power.
  • Reading is considering limiting data centers to its Heavy Manufacturing district and may use a six-month curative-amendment moratorium to draft new rules.
  • Americus is considering industrial-district siting, City Council approval, setbacks, and noise limits while officials assess possible company interest.
  • Prologis received approval to convert a 1-million-square-foot warehouse in Allen Township, with closed-loop cooling and a privately funded electrical substation proposed to address infrastructure concerns.
  • Across the proposals, residents and officials are focused on continuous noise, utility costs, water consumption, environmental effects, and proximity to homes, schools, parks, or childcare facilities.

History

07/23/2026

The biggest change is that Akron’s data-center proposal has moved from planning-stage support to an approved conditional-use framework, while Allentown’s project has become more defined as a refiled edge data center after a withdrawn application. The story also sharpens around tighter siting and disclosure rules, with Americus and Reading still actively drafting restrictions.

07/22/2026

The story has broadened from Allentown-area warehouse conversions to a wider multi-city push in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Georgia to tighten data center zoning and approval rules. The new emphasis is on specific regulatory mechanisms—special approvals, hearings, disclosures, and moratoriums—that could slow or reshape projects already in the pipeline.

Full History

Featured

Timeline: 56 Days

Jun 2Jun 9Jun 23Jun 30Jul 14Jul 21

Additional Articles

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

The Morning Call / Lindsay Weber07-14-2026
Allentown planning commission holds a special meeting Thursday to review Quantm Group LLC plans to convert a warehouse into a data center at 2401 W. Emmaus Ave.
Signal Akron / Arielle Kass07-11-2026
Akron planning commission voted 5-0 to revise zoning so data centers need conditional-use permits, with a public hearing set for July 27.
Lehighvalleylive / Nick Falsone06-14-2026
Prologis obtained Allen Township final approval on March 24 for the Lehigh Valley East 16 warehouse-to-data-center conversion at 2500 Liberty Drive, with building-permit details expected soon.

⭐⭐⭐

WFMZ07-07-2026
Reading, Pennsylvania officials proposed zoning guardrails for data centers in the Heavy Manufacturing district and discussed curative amendments as Allentown began revising adopted rules.
Williamsport Sun-Gazette07-02-2026
Williamsport City Council adopted a 6-0 resolution in 2024 directing a 180-day zoning review and curative amendment for invalid data-center exclusion provisions.
WFMZ-TV 69 News06-02-2026
Allentown City Council schedules a Bill 20 hearing Wednesday to set zoning parameters for data centers as a warehouse conversion at 2401 W. Emaus Ave proceeds under prior rules.
WFMZ-TV 69 News06-03-2026
Allentown City Council tabled Bill 20 on AI data center zoning after residents raised concerns about setbacks and municipal curative amendment implications for a 180-day review window.