Seattle And Spokane Freeze Data Centers

The core story is largely unchanged, but the framing has sharpened around local power capacity and how large data center customers should fund related infrastructure. The current version also drops some earlier specifics, such as the named developer examples and Seattle’s employee-staffing concern.

The story has moved from local planning and review into confirmed one-year freezes in Seattle and Spokane, with both cities now explicitly tying the moratoria to major utility-capacity concerns and possible permanent regulation. Seattle’s scale and Spokane’s Avista-related 500-megawatt context make the potential impact look larger and more concrete than before.

• Seattle unanimously approved a one-year freeze, with a possible six-month extension.
• Five Seattle-area proposals were reported to seek up to 369 megawatts.
• Avista paused talks with a potential 500-megawatt customer.
• Residents and groups are now pushing for permanent restrictions or bans.
• Potential stranded-cost risks are newly highlighted in the debate.

The story has expanded from Seattle’s single-city moratorium into a broader Washington-state pattern of local governments moving preemptively against large data centers. Spokane’s ban and Snoqualmie’s review efforts make the issue more regional and more about local rule-setting before proposals advance.

• Spokane approved a separate one-year ban on new large data centers.
• Snoqualmie began discussing preemptive code changes.
• Avista said it paused negotiations over a potential 500-megawatt data center.
• Local governments are trying to define rules before future proposals advance too far.

Seattle has adopted an emergency one-year moratorium on new large data centers while it studies their effects on the electric grid, water use, land use, rates, jobs, and public health. The action responds to proposed large-scale facilities and strong public opposition, and it is paired with a policy framework for evaluating future proposals and cost impacts.