Last Update: 08/01/2026 at 2:00 PM EST
California Child Privacy Law Fight
Coverage from Alston & Bird Privacy, National Law Review, and others
Articles
11
Active Days
642
The Topic

California's child privacy law is moving through appellate review, with the Ninth Circuit allowing some age-estimation and privacy provisions to proceed while leaving other data-use, DPIA, and dark-pattern restrictions blocked or uncertain. The main tension is between child-protection rules and First Amendment challenges from platform operators.
First Article: 09/26/24
Latest Article: 06/29/26
Summary
- The strongest current signal is appellate litigation over California's Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, not broad policy rollout.
- The Ninth Circuit has partially lifted an injunction, allowing some child-privacy obligations to move forward while keeping several provisions blocked.
- Age estimation, high-privacy defaults, monitoring or tracking signals, and privacy tools remain the most durable enforceable elements in the current record.
- Restrictions tied to data use, dark patterns, and some assessment duties face vagueness and constitutional challenges.
- NetChoice and major platform companies remain the main challengers, while California officials continue to frame the law as a child-safety measure.
- The topic is coherent and fairly stable, but the legal scope of the law remains unsettled and may change again on remand.
- The signal is moderate to dense and ongoing, with most evidence drawn from recent court decisions rather than historical background.
History
This topic is new, but as new articles are added to it this area will summarize shifts, changes and expansions of the issues.
